Wednesday, July 11, 2012

Yet another great new resource! Dumbarton Oaks Syriac resource portal.

Monday, July 9, 2012

Edessa Bible- OT Peshitta info: http://hum.leiden.edu/religion/research/antiquity/the-bible-of-edessa.html

Sunday, July 8, 2012

Great Byzantium portal: http://www29.homepage.villanova.edu/christopher.haas/Byzantium.htm 

How we use our words- jihad or struggle?

Sunday, July 1, 2012

It bothers me when people use words incorrectly, especially when it has major social conflict implications. One example is an issue central to my research- that the English word "struggle" (or "wrestle") is the best translation of jihad, yet in the West we continue to not-translate it, which keeps the word as a symbol of the alien "other" of Islam. This "othering" has consequences. "We" have our struggles for "freedom" but "they" have their nasty jihad! It is so hypocritical. And I've noticed this in all European languages. The French and Spanish have their lutte and lucha, and the Germans their kampf, but they refuse to translate jihad too.
This results in increased levels of inter-communal violence and allows extremist "white" groups to perpetuate hate. It's time for people in the West to be honest about translating jihad, especially when the Arabic Bible has Jesus undergoing a jihad in the Garden of Gethsamene! English texts and articles and blog entries etc should no longer use "jihad" but instead "struggle" or "wrestle", and the equivalent applies in all European languages.
---
This post is part of an Orthodox synchroblog, that is, a number of Orthodox Christian bloggers have written blog posts on the same general topic on the same day, with links to the other posts on the same topic, so it should be possible to surf from one post to the other, and read them all if one wants to.
The theme of this month’s synchroblog is “The words we use”.

+ Annalisa Boyd (Orthodox) of The Ascetic Lives of Mothers on Let the Words of My Mouth
+ Cristina Perdomo (Orthodox Christian — Orthodox Church in America (OCA)) of Reachingfromadistance on Cement
+ Dn Stephen Hayes (Orthodox Christian) of Khanya on What’s that you were saying?
+ Elizabeth Perdomo (Orthodox Christian) of Living a Liturgical Life on What About Words?
+ Katherine Bolger Hyde (Orthodox Christian) of God-Haunted Fiction on Eat Your Words
+ Susan Cushman (Orthodox Christian) of Pen & Palette on How We Use Our Words: “Christian” is Not an Adjective
If you are a blogger and would like to take part in future Orthodox synchroblogs, there is a mailing list for participants at YahooGroups, where you can get more information, and where we will discuss future topics, etc.

Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Tawitha: Sharing our Syriac Research

Syriac Studies Conference - 24 August 2012 – Melbourne, Australia

This one day conference will cover all areas in Syriac studies- language, theology, history and culture, with an emphasis on the sharing of research in progress, and opportunities for discussion of possible future collaboration.

Papers and presentations are invited from researchers in either the standard 20 minute paper format, or as a 5 minute research idea presentation/note, or longer 30 minute paper.

Topics could include Syriac poetry, linguistic issues, history, church fathers, asceticism, theology, philosophy and worldview themes.

Presenters will mostly be a mix of PhD candidates and PhD holders but undergraduates are also welcome to attend.

Location: St Nicholas Church Hall (rear of church) Cnr Victoria Pde and Simpson St, East Melbourne. Parking at front. Close to North Richmond station.

Time: 9.30am – 4.30pm.   Cost: $20.

This is the first of what is foreseen as an annual or more frequent event, to be hosted by various participants. This year’s conference is being sponsored and hosted by MIOCS (Melbourne Institute for Orthodox Christian Studies).

For expressions of interest, submissions (title and abstract due 31 July 2012), or enquiries contact: John D’Alton jdalton@frontier.com.au

Some more manuscript links

Saturday, May 19, 2012

Thanks Roger Pearse for pointing out:

Pyle- gateway to Greek manuscripts-
http://www.pyle.unicas.it/02_fac_onweb.html

Pinakes- Texts and Manuscripts in Greek-
http://pinakes.irht.cnrs.fr/pages/show?id_cmspage=8

You'll have to play around with search options and the manuscript tab to get what you really want but ...
Greek and Latin manuscripts- http://gallica.bnf.fr/

Two papers on Aphrahat

Thursday, May 10, 2012

I recently gave a paper at the AEMA (Australian Early Medieval Association) conference in Brisbane, and here's the abstract:
Aphrahat’s “Resurrection Asceticism” and its journey across the Mediterranean.

When John Cassian traveled to Marseille in 415 he brought from the Orient a perspective on monasticism as being an “angelic life” which emphasised virginity. These concepts, along with a “resurrection asceticism” had previously been enunciated by Syriac bishop Aphrahat in 337 as the foundation for spirituality. Cassian may also have built on the views of Chrysostom and similar ideas already known in the West in Augustine’s De Virginitate. Yet in their journey West, key elements of Aphrahat’s asceticism did not translate or were lost, especially his “resurrection asceticism”. Aphrahat’s emphasis on an inaugurated eschatology as a motivation for virginity has not been explored and his focus on the “sons of the resurrection” has been either misunderstood or ignored. The differences between Aphrahat visavis Cassian and Augustine on these points has also not been treated. This paper explores these themes in Aphrahat through an analysis of the structure and central arguments of his “Demonstrations”, and compares his emphases with the related views of Cassian, Augustine, Chrysostom, and Gaudentius of Brescia. Whereas Augustine and Chrysostom emphasise Mary as a model of virginity and Paul’s focus on marriage as a distraction from pure devotion, Aphrahat concentrates on a present experience of the resurrection life, a life like the angels. His use of Luke 20:36 is unique and his approach is more hope-oriented than Augustine.

I also have a paper accepted to present in Malta in July at the international Syriac Symposium, with the abstract:

Sons of the Resurrection: Inaugurated eschatology as a structural key to Aphrahat’s Demonstrations.
The rationale for the structure of Aphrahat’s 23 Demonstrations continues to elude scholars, but a close reading of Demonstration 6 and its emphasis on the resurrection provides a way to understand the place of many other of the unexplained inclusions. Discussions of the bnay qyama have tended to sideline the relevance of the qyamtha. This paper uses metaphor analysis and close reading techniques to elucidate the core themes and rationale of Demonstration 6 and its links to the chapters on war, virginity, penitence, and death and the last things etc. Rather than being “out of place” (Lehto 2010:25), “On the Resurrection” and “On Wars” are shown to be closely related to the theme of the virginal state of the angelic life of the sons of the resurrection. This paper fills a gap in the understanding of Aphrahat’s thematic structuring, and also demonstrates that the Sons of the Covenant should also be understood as the Sons of the Resurrection.